USX or uSDX QRP HF Transceiver

This build is based on the interesting design by Guido, PE1NNZ.  The transceiver originally used the very successful QCX as an initial platform, but it now has it’s own life and there are several scratch builds using dedicated PCBs on the forum.

An Atmel ATMEGA 328 is pushed close to the limit in an SDR application processing SSB IQ from a Tayloe IQ detector.  The speaker audio is supplied directly from the 328 pins as PWM.  So no audio amp is required.
The transmitter uses a class D or E PA and implements Envelope Elimination and Restoration (EER) to deliver a highly efficient effectively linear power amplifer.

The implementation does have several compromises, however, running in a simple 8 bit processor with 10 bit A/D convertors.
Refer to the Github page for design details.

This build presently uses two boards, the UI and processor and the RF board in a stacked arrangement connected by headers.  A test PCB was put together for the RF side, with the intention of experimenting with the design.  The processor board was built using proto board.

The unit all boxed up measures about 7.5 x 8 x 3.5 cm and hopefully could be used on a SOTA trip to keep the weight down.  It was painted bright orange so as not to lose it!

Completed unit

RF Test Board

Processor UI Proto

The PWM speaker audio worked fairly well on an efficient speaker but not so well on a small 50mm speaker.  An LM386 amp was added to boost the volume to useful outdoor SOTA levels.
The RF board ended up with lots of links and suffered from changing chips and experimenting.  I might do a final board, but there are others now doing a pretty good job of boards on the UCX forum.

To speed up the build, I used an Adafruit Si5351a breakout board, although this uses a 25MHz clock necessitating a def change in the software and some hardware changes.

So,how does it perform?

The RX audio sounds OK, I had some problems keeping the PWM frequency out of the extra audio stage despite additional filtering.  There is some residual hiss that is quite noticeable on low volume settings.   The Tayloe detector has spurious responses at odd harmonics, so it’s relying on the transmitter LPF to reduce these.  A BPF or tuned bifilar toroid like the QCX would improve selectivity.
There are regular “pops” on the receiver that can be eliminated by selecting 13dB attenuation in the menu at the cost of some sensitivity.
Others have had problems with OLED display noise getting into the receiver, although none noted on this build.  Good supply rail bypassing and grounding is essential.

The transmit audio is quite intelligible, although does sound a bit edgy.  The transmit spectrum looks just clean enough for amateur use with harmonics and spurs around 50dB.  I have made some SOTA chaser contacts successfully into NSW with it.  The Transmit power is around 7W, this should be reduced back to 5W as it’s marginal with the design at this level.

Considering all the above, on a summit in most cases it is probably ok, although you might get some comments on rough TX audio quality.

In summary, it’s a pretty amazing minimalistic SDR design and squeezes almost everything out of the processor.  I look forward to an implementation on a more powerful platform with higher A/D resolution with more speed and bits.

They are getting smaller, uSDX top RHS

This entry was posted in Projects, radio communications, SOTA and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to USX or uSDX QRP HF Transceiver

  1. Paul Taylor says:

    Fascinating. A step into today’s generation of simple, minimal, small low power SDR transceivers that can be reliably homebrewed without sophisticated tools.

    What would it take for better performance? A Teensy perhaps, wider ADC/DAC, other things?

    Paul VK3HN.

    • vk3yy says:

      Maybe a Teensy 4.0+, it has been suggested on the forum numerous times, possible with a codec board. I think the Teensy 4.0 has a 12 bit ADC (12dB better than 328?). A 16 bit ADC would be nice.

      • Paul Taylor says:

        There are external ADCs on breakout boards that could be used and to extend the signal handling capability of the MCU. It won’t be long before a really good combination arises.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s